I would say that not only talking about the scientific community, but certainly the gentleman's knowledge on these areas certainly greatly exceeds that of ours, and I have no reason to dispute what the gentleman says. I have already indicated that what we try to do with this legislation was try to work it out with the other body, with the other side, so that we could have a piece of legislation which would be a good piece of legislation, but certainly far from perfect. So having said all of that, I assure the gentleman that we will address those issues in the next Congress.
Gus Bilirakis: “I would say that not only talking about the scientific community, but certainly the gentleman's knowledge on these areas…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing collaboration on legislation and addressing issues in the next Congress.
Share
More from Gus Bilirakis
Why are we forcing families, businesses, and communities to adjust their schedules every spring and fall? The twice-yearly clock change is a relic of the past that no longer reflects the way Americans live.
We are learning from those experiences, because a law that gets struck down in court does not protect a child.
I have no further speakers, and I am prepared to close after Mr. Pallone. I reserve the balance of my time.
I couldn't agree more. There is no question that this is definitely needed. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Idaho (Mr. Fulcher), the vice chairman of the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and…





