There is no gray on whether or not, if we can cover 10 million kids, we should. There is no gray for most folks. I don't think there is any tinge of partisanship on the basic instinct that parents want to make sure they provide health care for their kids. But if that is not the priorities that our colleagues on the other side of the aisle share, what is? Well, I think a glance at this chart will demonstrate what their priorities are. This chart details 37 days in Iraq and what that would pay for if we were comparing it to what we could pay for to cover children's health care. One day in Iraq costs $330 million in funds that we appropriate.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: “There is no gray on whether or not, if we can cover 10 million kids, we should. There is no gray for most folks. I don't…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of children's health care funding during a debate on health policy.
Share
More from Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Making life more affordable. I mean, whether it's gas, groceries, utilities, housing, healthcare.
it is not the place for Congress to be pushing for increased use of experimental treatments. This procedure is highly invasive, requiring an injection of medication into a collection of nerves at the bottom of the front side of the neck…
This rule will significantly weaken the ESA and usher in the often-irreversible loss of habitat, hastening the extinction of plants and animals that are a vital part of our state’s culture and tourism economy.
My bill, as you have heard, is straightforward and bipartisan. It rights a wrong that occurred in some cases by accident where a Jewish servicemember was laid to rest under a headstone misidentifying their religion. It ensures the United…





