Given that the administration has repeatedly--this administration has repeatedly targeted this program for elimination essentially or the funding for elimination, is enough attention paid to the program to ensure that the most updated climate conditions happening in states are going to be factored into the formula that is used?
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: “Given that the administration has repeatedly--this administration has repeatedly targeted this program for elimination…”
On the recordFebruary 6, 2019
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Wasserman Schultz questions the administration's funding cuts and climate considerations for a program.
Share
More from Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Jul 27, 2026
This rule will significantly weaken the ESA and usher in the often-irreversible loss of habitat, hastening the extinction of plants and animals that are a vital part of our state’s culture and tourism economy.
Aug 17, 2026
I’ll be damned if I’m going to let them steal Broward’s political power, de-unify us and prevent us from standing up for our community’s values.
Aug 17, 2026
I fight every single day to help improve the lived experience of the people that I represent.
Aug 7, 2026
That’s why I’m running: to deliver resources to the people of Broward who know and trust me and want me to keep fighting for them.





