on July 22, 2003, I introduced an amendment to provide congressional support for the current U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) policy and practice against approving patent claims directed to human organisms, including human embryos and human fetuses. The House of Representatives approved the amendment without objection on July 22, 2003, as section 801 of the Fiscal Year 2004 Commerce/Justice/State Appropriations Bill. The amendment, now included in the Omnibus appropriations bill as section 634 of H.R. 2673, reads as follows: ``None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available under this Act may be sued to issue patents on claims directed to or encompassing a human organism.'' The current Patent Office policy is that ``non-human organisms, including animals'' are patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101, but that human organisms, including human embryos and human fetuses, are not patentable. Therefore, any claim directed to a living organism must include the qualification ``non-human'' to avoid rejection. This amendment provides unequivocal congressional support for this current practice of the U.S. patent office.
David Weldon: “on July 22, 2003, I introduced an amendment to provide congressional support for the current U.S. Patent and Trademark…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment to prohibit patents on human organisms.
Share
More from David Weldon
while I believe that Government Sponsored Enterprise, GSE, reform is absolutely necessary, I cannot support H.R. 1427, the Federal Housing Finance Reform Act, in its current form. It is important for Congress to promote home-ownership for…
I believe if is important to explain here and get on the record the substance of these amendments and why they are critical to securing our homeland. My first amendment (No. 14) would have tied funding for the Community Oriented Policing…
I thought freedom was worth fighting for. I thought, when we saw all those Iraqis risk their lives to go and vote and establish a government and establish a Constitution and to have, possibly, freedom of speech, that was something worth…
on rollcall Nos. 60, 61, and 62, I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no.'' Amendment Offered by Ms. Lee The Acting CHAIRMAN. The pending business is the demand for a recorded vote on the amendment offered…





