I just wanted to give you some specifics. This is a tight budget year, as we all know. And just to cite one of the accounts that this amendment would obviously devastate, we have already reduced the lunar precursor robotics program by $20 million. There is a $16 million reduction in the constellation systems, $115 million reduction in the exploration systems research technology. Total reduction already in this bill, $151 million from the President's request; and, obviously, a huge cut like this would devastate it further. So I would recommend a ``no'' vote on the Gilchrest amendment. But I applaud the gentleman for his passion on this issue.
David Weldon: “I just wanted to give you some specifics. This is a tight budget year, as we all know. And just to cite one of the…”
Share
More from David Weldon
I would be very happy to yield to the distinguished gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Mollohan).
Due to the launch of the Space Shuttle Discovery earlier today, I was unable to be present for several votes. Had I been present, I would ask that the official Record reflect that I would have voted in favor of the following bills: H.R…
The gentleman's amendment increases and decreases the amount for the Department of Commerce's Departmental Management Account. There is no net effect on the funding level of the account. I have no objection to the gentleman's amendment…
Reclaiming my time, as I understand it, what you all have laid out is not that easy to do basically; that you have to make a case in front of a judge, and if it is a known al Qaeda operative, I think we should be listening to all of their…





