I support H.R. 3313, The Marriage Protection Act. This bill prevents unelected, lifetime-appointed federal judges from striking down the provision of the Defense of Marriage Act. The Defense of Marriage Act overwhelmingly passed in the House and the Senate and was signed into law by President Clinton in 1996. H.R. 3313 simply provides that cases involving the section of Defense of Marriage Act--that protects states' rights--must be brought in state court. This brings valuable protection to the states and ensures that one state does not have to recognize a same sex marriage granted by another state. It also keeps federal courts from forcing states to recognize same-sex marriages that other states, such as Massachusetts, have legalized. This bill is a good first step, but what is ultimately needed in order to protect time-honored, traditional marriage is an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Unfortunately, the Senate failed to pass this amendment last week. That vote was 48 to 50, with Senators John Kerry and John Edwards failing to vote. It fell short of the number needed to ensure passage so that the American people could consider a Constitutional Amendment. My constituents in Florida, and the majority of the American people, do not agree with a hand full of activist judges and courts that are redefining marriage in America.
David Weldon: “I support H.R. 3313, The Marriage Protection Act. This bill prevents unelected, lifetime-appointed federal judges from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for the Marriage Protection Act and the need for a constitutional amendment on marriage.
Share
More from David Weldon
today I rise to bring to the attention of the House an important new plan that seeks to bridge the longstanding divide between the Israelis and the Palestinians. The plan is titled ``The Right Road to Peace,'' and it is a comprehensive…
I would be very happy to yield to the distinguished gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Mollohan).
I understand that I want them to keep listening. I want the information, and this is what the debate is about. You want to stop. You want go to a judge. I do not think we should.
Mr. Speaker, the Democratic majority pays lip service to their support of religious people and faith-based groups, but now they are here today, in this House, enacting a piece of legislation that I believe is a shot across the bow to all…





