This legislation is good for consumers, good for the environment, good for American workers, and good for the economy.
Dan Miller: “This legislation is good for consumers, good for the environment, good for American workers, and good for the economy.”
Editor's note · Context
Positive assessment of the Sugar Program Reform Act.
Share
More from Dan Miller
I support my colleague's proposal to eliminate the mandate on local education agencies to spend 1 percent of their Chapter I funds for parental involvement. I cannot justify forcing local educating agencies to narrow the parameters of…
I have been proud to have a chance to work with the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Boehner] on a series of amendments to try to cut spending and add fiscal sanity to this bill. This bill started off as $10.5 billion when the President introduced…
The Sugar Program Reform Act will do what the 1996 farm bill failed to accomplish.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the Michel substitute. It is a streamlined and fiscally responsible way to address the education needs from the Federal Government level. Mr. Boehner and I have offered 8 amendments so far to add some…





