The sugar program is an archaic, unnecessary government handout to corporate sugar producers at the expense of consumers, workers, and the environment.
Dan Miller: “The sugar program is an archaic, unnecessary government handout to corporate sugar producers at the expense of…”
Editor's note · Context
Characterization of the sugar program as outdated and harmful.
Share
More from Dan Miller
the opponents of this try and create the impression that I am opposed to library books, that the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Boehner] is opposed to library books or opposed to computers in the classroom. That is not the argument. There are…
I support my colleague's proposal to eliminate the mandate on local education agencies to spend 1 percent of their Chapter I funds for parental involvement. I cannot justify forcing local educating agencies to narrow the parameters of…
Mr. Chairman, H.R. 6 cannot pass the House in its current form. Somewhere along the line the bill lost track of our tradition of allowing States, local school boards and families to develop education policy and, instead embarked on a…
I rise today in strong opposition to H.R. 2108, the Black Lung Benefits Restoration Act. This bill represents yet another expansion of entitlements without a single thought dedicated to paying for the new spending. The changes made by this…





