The framers saw a need for amendments at some point in time, so they provided a way to do that in the Constitution itself. But I am opposed to amending the Constitution to write fiscal theory into it, fiscal policy. I am also opposed to destroying our constitutional system of mixed powers and checks and balances by a constitutional amendment to balance the budget. I respect those who differ with me, but why do we keep on talking about a constitutional amendment? We Senators have as much power as Senators in the year 2002 will have. Why wait?
Cord Byrd: “The framers saw a need for amendments at some point in time, so they provided a way to do that in the Constitution…”
On the recordMarch 10, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a constitutional amendment to balance the budget during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Cord Byrd
Aug 2, 2007
While I opposed the Specter amendment, I do believe that the alternative minimum tax needs to be reformed. In the coming months, I hope to support efforts to do away with the inequities of the alternative minimum tax that unfairly burden…
Nov 8, 2007
Every day that the Defense appropriations conference report is delayed, it delays a $40 billion increase for the Department of Defense, delays $11.6 billion for mine-resistant vehicles for our troops in Iraq and a $2.9 billion increase for…
Sep 10, 2024
We do not sit idle waiting for bad things to happen in order to correct them.





