Yes. That is just the question. Why subject this country's security to the necessity of a supermajority vote when the Nation's very life is in danger, the security of the American people are in danger, the security of the troops in the field are in danger, and the security of the planes in the air is in danger? Why subject a decision at that critical moment to a supermajority? The Framers, in their wisdom, did not do it. And we have fought a good many wars.
Cord Byrd: “Yes. That is just the question. Why subject this country's security to the necessity of a supermajority vote when the…”
On the recordFebruary 16, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of requiring a supermajority vote for national security decisions.
Share
More from Cord Byrd
Mar 13, 2008
I was saddened to learn that my good friend and former colleague, Senator Howard Metzenbaum, has passed away. He was a man of courage, conviction, commitment, and toughness. He was a labor lawyer and union lobbyist, who grew up in poverty…
Feb 14, 2008
I was sad to learn that Richard Darman passed away last week. Mr. Darman was a good man, an outstanding public servant, and a great American. I liked him very much. Dick Darman was a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Business School whose…





