I must oppose the Sessions amendment because it would eliminate critical border security funds from this bill. The subcommittee has carefully balanced the needs of our law enforcement personnel on the border, and an across-the board cut, like that proposed in the Sessions amendment, would leave our borders dangerously exposed. I remain committed to strengthening the fencing along the border. But it is unwise to finance that fencing with cuts in our border security elsewhere. I join the chairman in opposing this amendment. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the amendment, as modified.
Cord Byrd: “I must oppose the Sessions amendment because it would eliminate critical border security funds from this bill. The…”
Share
More from Cord Byrd
If the administration's request for 2008 is funded in full, appropriations for military operations and other war-related activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in the war on terrorism will rise to $188 billion this year and to a…
Florida is committed to ensuring that all eligible Floridians who want to vote have the opportunity to do so.
I was saddened to learn that my good friend and former colleague, Senator Howard Metzenbaum, has passed away. He was a man of courage, conviction, commitment, and toughness. He was a labor lawyer and union lobbyist, who grew up in poverty…
Today the Senate marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of Lyndon Baines Johnson. The Senate has changed much, in a sense; in another sense, it has changed little since the days when Senator and Majority Leader Johnson strode through…





