For fiscal year 2003, the President has proposed increasing nondefense programs by only 1 percent. He has threatened to veto appropriations bills that have "excessive spending." For the INS, he has proposed an increase of only $150 million or about a 2-percent increase. That is not even enough to cover inflation. So if we must do more for the INS, what are we supposed to cut? What are we going to cut if we do more than that for the INS? Veterans programs? Are we going to cut veterans programs? Are we going to cut education programs, highways, programs to promote our energy independence, programs dealing with the environment? What do we cut? If we don't do that, we run afoul of the President's threat to veto appropriations bills.
Cord Byrd: “For fiscal year 2003, the President has proposed increasing nondefense programs by only 1 percent. He has threatened to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget proposals and potential cuts to various programs during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Cord Byrd
I have waited many hours here many times. I never make a fuss about it. I will just leave the floor and----
I, for one, will definitely be interested to see how the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State are progressing on WHTI implementation. And we will be able to do so because we mandate that the Departments provide…
Adoption of this joint resolution will ensure that we answer some of our Nation's most pressing needs and avoid a totally unnecessary Government shutdown. The last time each of the appropriations bills was signed into law by October 1, the…
I oppose Social Security privatization-- unequivocally and without question. The language in the DeMint amendment, which would encourage the Finance Committee to report legislation that would embrace private investment accounts within…





