I voted in favor of tabling the amendment. Like many of my colleagues, I encourage small businesses--including those owned by socially and culturally disadvantaged individuals--to take an active role in bidding for federally funded highway construction contracts. But, while I understand the goals of the DBE program, I do not support preferential treatment for certain businesses on the basis of the race, ethnicity, or gender of their owners. I believe that the Constitution, as amended by the 5th, 13th, and 14th Amendments, does not permit the government to discriminate or differentiate on the basis of race, ethnicity, or gender--regardless of whether the government's motive is malicious or benign. If the precepts of 'equal protection' and 'due process' are to mean anything, then they must ensure that no one in this country is granted favorable or unfavorable treatment on the basis of some single differentiating characteristic. My reading of the Constitution is supported by the Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Adarand versus Pena.
Cord Byrd: “I voted in favor of tabling the amendment. Like many of my colleagues, I encourage small businesses--including those…”
Editor's note · Context
Explaining his vote on an amendment related to the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program.
Share
More from Cord Byrd
1 year ago, Congress sent the President a war funding supplemental that included clear direction to bring our troops home by December of 2007. The President chose to veto that bill. If he had signed that bill, most of our troops would be…
Sunday, June 20, is the 147th anniversary of wild and wonderful West Virginia's joining the United States as the 35th State. I am proud of all that West Virginia has offered and continues to offer to the United States. West Virginia is a…
these are perilous economic times. The national economy is shedding jobs at an alarming rate. Nearly 2 million jobs have been lost nationwide in the last 3 months, with 3.6 million jobs lost since December 2007. In West Virginia, our…
I support this alternative to the President's deeply flawed budget policies. The President submitted a budget request with a shocking price tag, $3.1 trillion. In the entire history of the Republic, the Congress has never had to grapple…





