I want to be certain that there is no ambiguity about what these funds are for. We are all aware that there was never any intention that these funds would be available for lethal assistance or for the expansion of settlements, but I think it is important to reaffirm that understanding. These NADR funds would not be available for offensive purposes, or for any purpose unrelated to the purchase of defensive, non-lethal anti-terrorism equipment, and the Senator from Kentucky has confirmed that.
Cord Byrd: “I want to be certain that there is no ambiguity about what these funds are for. We are all aware that there was never…”
On the recordJune 5, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the intended use of funds for non-lethal anti-terrorism equipment.
Share
More from Cord Byrd
Sep 10, 2024
Florida is committed to ensuring that all eligible Floridians who want to vote have the opportunity to do so.
Feb 14, 2008
on Monday, February 18, the United States will celebrate President's Day. President's Day takes on a particular significance this year, as the Nation is actively involved in the selection process for a new President. It is heartening to…
Apr 10, 2008
It has been written that King of England Edward I--known as the ``Hammer of the Scots''--once tried to prohibit London's burning of coal. He is said to have proclaimed, ``Be it known to all within the sound of my voice, whoever shall be…





