for many years, I have been growing increasingly concerned about the Senate as a forum for debate. Senators at every turn seem bent upon undermining this institution and the vision of our constitutional framers embodied in this upper body of the Congress. The Senate is the only forum in our Government where the perfection of laws may be unhurried and where controversial decisions may be hammered out on the anvil of lengthy debate. It may be slow; it may be unwieldy; it may be frustrating to some; but it is the best means to achieving compromise, to ensuring an informed citizenry, to protecting the rights of the minority. To shut out the minority by limiting the right to debate is to needlessly and detrimentally infuse partisanship into the legislative process. That is exactly what we are seeing in this budget resolution. Included in the Budget chairman's resolution are reconciliation instructions to the Finance Committee to report $81 billion in tax cuts to extend the child credit, marriage penalty, and 10-percent bracket expansion that are scheduled to expire this year. If misused, there is no procedural mechanism in the Senate more contemptuous of debate than the budget reconciliation process, and it is being misused. It is a process that has morphed into an annual exercise where the majority party takes advantage of the limitations on amendment and debate allowed by the Budget Act to shield controversial legislation from public discussion.
Cord Byrd: “for many years, I have been growing increasingly concerned about the Senate as a forum for debate. Senators at every…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the Senate's role in debate and the misuse of the budget reconciliation process.
Share
More from Cord Byrd
as I think about Senator Clinton's leaving the Senate to become Secretary of State, I am reminded of the words of the great English bard William Shakespeare, who wrote that ``parting is such sweet sorrow.'' Senator Clinton's departure from…
I was sad to learn that Richard Darman passed away last week. Mr. Darman was a good man, an outstanding public servant, and a great American. I liked him very much. Dick Darman was a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Business School whose…
I oppose the Crapo amendment because of the limitations that it would impose on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These institutions have been very helpful to homeowners in West Virginia who are seeking home loan modifications. I do not believe…
I will oppose the joint resolution of disapproval and vote to release these funds, but I do so adding my voice to those putting the incoming administration on notice. This is an enormous sum of money and authority being given to the…





