Would not the Senator agree that filibusters used in such instances as he has just related here are not the filibusters which have caused the Senate the problems of abuse which most Senators and I perceive as being problems? Do the Senators not agree if real problems have arisen--if there have been real problems, and assuming that there have been, assuming that what we call filibusters were really filibusters on motions to proceed--would the Senators not agree that on motions to proceed most of these filibusters, so-called filibusters, have occurred?
Cord Byrd: “Would not the Senator agree that filibusters used in such instances as he has just related here are not the filibusters…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nature and impact of filibusters in the Senate.
Share
More from Cord Byrd
We do not sit idle waiting for bad things to happen in order to correct them.
I oppose the Shelby amendment. In our zeal to protect consumers from egregious banking and lending practices, I fear the Senate is paying too little attention to basic constitutional tenets. The Shelby amendment proposes to create a…
I am saddened to learn that Mr. Johnny H. Killian has passed away. Mr. Killian was a highly regarded, highly admired, and highly utilized specialist in American public law at the Congressional Research Service. For more than four decades…
I thank Senator Webb, Senator Warner, and Senator Hagel for their leadership on this extremely critical issue of providing education benefits to our veterans. I am a cosponsor of their legislation and was happy to include it in the…





