We are voting on this new Bush doctrine of preventive strikes--preemptive strikes. There is nothing in this Constitution about preemptive strikes. Yet in this rag here, this resolution, S.J. Res. 46, we are about to vote to put the imprimatur of the Congress on that doctrine. That is what the Bush administration wants us to do. They want Congress to put its stamp of approval on that Bush doctrine of preemptive strikes. That is a mistake. That is a mistake. Are we going to present the face of America as the face of a bully that is ready to go out at high noon with both guns blazing or are we going to maintain the face of America as a country which believes in justice, the rule of law, freedom and liberty and the rights of all people to work out their ultimate destiny?
Cord Byrd: “We are voting on this new Bush doctrine of preventive strikes--preemptive strikes. There is nothing in this Constitution…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Bush administration's doctrine of preemptive strikes during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Cord Byrd
I opposed the Ensign and Stabenow amendments regarding Social Security and illegal immigrants, because those amendments violated section 313 of the Budget Act--the Byrd Rule--which prohibits extraneous matter on budget reconciliation…
Florida is committed to ensuring that all eligible Floridians who want to vote have the opportunity to do so.
I oppose the Crapo amendment because of the limitations that it would impose on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These institutions have been very helpful to homeowners in West Virginia who are seeking home loan modifications. I do not believe…
We are equally committed to preventing election fraud and protecting the integrity of Florida's voter rolls.





