Initially, I thought the Commission would be in place long enough to get us to a balanced budget. That would be around the year 2000, according to the Congressional Budget Office, if we make the kind of reductions that are called for, and that is roughly $34 billion a year from the Congressional Budget Office baseline. But I think it would be important to keep it in place whenever there was a time when there was a projected deficit so that we would have a means on which to fall back. That is point one. Point two. I would like to make this comment. We are not taking away Congress' authority. Congress can go ahead and carry out their responsibility for making $34 billion a year in spending cuts. If they do that, there is nothing for the Commission to do. But if the Congress fails to meet that target, then the Commission goes into effect.
Connie Mack: “Initially, I thought the Commission would be in place long enough to get us to a balanced budget. That would be around…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of a Commission in achieving a balanced budget.
Share
More from Connie Mack
The deal is on the -- that is on the table makes the hole deeper. And so don't -- you shouldn't expect people, who believe that we should balance the budget, to vote for a deal that makes the hole deeper.
I think there are a lot of people back home who are watching this debate unfold, and more importantly, are watching the Congress and the administration. And, you know, I think a lot of people at home are scratching their head. They're…
I mean, most people recognize that the cartels' activity has gotten worse, that they are using every tool available to displace government.
I do believe that they stand in the way of democracy building and protecting democracies in Latin America instead of supporting democracies.





