I do not believe that the ``judgment fund'' would be an available source of payment as a result of a court order. As the gentleman knows, section 6(f) of this substitute clearly states that payments under this legislation are to come from an agency's annual appropriations, and if the agency that issued the regulation in question does not have sufficient funds to satisfy the property owner's claim then the head of that agency must seek the necessary funds in its budget request for the following year.
Charles T. Canady: “I do not believe that the ``judgment fund'' would be an available source of payment as a result of a court order. As the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding sources for payments under proposed legislation.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
Is it not true that the bill the gentleman has sponsored would give the abortionist unfettered discretion to determine when an abortion would be performed during the third trimester or post viability? Because the gentleman has an exception…
the legislation which the President has again vetoed seeks to ban the procedure known as partial-birth abortion. The procedure is performed several thousand times each year, primarily in the fifth and sixth months of pregnancy, on healthy…
This is a very simple bill. It amends a statutory provision, which I will read. It is short enough for us to read right here and see what is being amended. The prohibition is this: ``Whoever using the mail or any facility or means of…
Given these pressures, farmers should not have to contend with government agencies that overstep regulatory boundaries set by Congress.





