The bill is very clear on that point. I think what we have here is a red herring that is being raised. I understand what is going on, but I think it is unfortunate that we are not focusing on what the bill actually does. I have no problem with criticizing the bill, but let us focus on what this actually does.
Defending the clarity and intent of a bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
The MSPA Clarification Act, which I am introducing today, seeks to ease the inequitable burden on farmers.
Under the laws of all the States, those individuals that the gentlewoman has specified would be enabled to go with the young woman to a judge for the judicial bypass. That is available under all the laws as required by the Supreme Court.
The statement in the letter is absolutely accurate. The terminology that happens to be applied to the procedure is not what is at issue. It is a matter of fact, however, that the procedure which exists, which is used, which would come…
No one is excluded from this protections of the amendment any more than people or ideas are excluded by the words ``in God we trust'' here on the wall of this Chamber.
Other voices in this conversation
