Mr. Chairman, in 1965, Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act to combat discrimination against African-Americans who were being unconstitutionally denied the right to vote. It was not until 1975 that Congress added a requirement mandating that certain jurisdictions provide voting materials in languages other than English. The underlying premise for this expansion of the law was that it was somehow discriminatory to conduct an election in the English language. Bilingual ballots were a means to remedy this alleged discrimination. However, when the use of bilingual ballots was last mandated in 1992, after 17 years of use, no statistical evidence was produced to show that bilingual ballots had increased vote participation by language minorities in any covered jurisdiction. On April 18, 1996, the Subcommittee on the Constitution held a hearing on what is now title II of the bill before the House. A number of distinguished witnesses testified that our society is becoming fragmented into linguistic ghettos, and federally mandated bilingual ballots only encourage such fragmentation.
Charles T. Canady: “Mr. Chairman, in 1965, Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act to combat discrimination against African-Americans who…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of bilingual ballots in elections during a House committee hearing.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
Occasionally we agree with the Judicial Conference. The Judicial Conference has looked at this, and they have decided that there is no compelling need for a change in the rule. Another point that I think we should consider is that the sort…
The MSPA Clarification Act, which I am introducing today, seeks to ease the inequitable burden on farmers.
I rise to urge the Members of the House to reject this motion to recommit. Like most of the arguments that have been made against this bill, this motion to recommit has nothing to do with the substance or purpose of the bill. I just ask…
I am not going to oppose the gentleman's amendment although I believe that there is a problem with the current system that needs to be rectified. Under the current system in many cases I believe that litigants who have a reasonable basis…





