This issue of entitlement, we have discussed that and I understand the concern. But I want to point out in section 7 of my substitute amendment, there is language that makes clear beyond any doubt that we are not creating an entitlement in this bill. It is simply not so that we are creating an entitlement. You may disagree with the bill, but let me read again the clear language here: ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any obligation of the United States to make any payment under this act shall be subject to the availability of appropriations.'' We must appropriate the money.
Charles T. Canady: “This issue of entitlement, we have discussed that and I understand the concern. But I want to point out in section 7 of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing entitlement language in a substitute amendment during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
What is required is that there be a meaningful application and that these steps be gone through as they are permitted under the local process.
The gentlewoman is certainly aware that the Supreme Court has required judicial bypass. And if a judicial bypass procedure is not available, the State law is invalid and unenforceable.
Given these pressures, farmers should not have to contend with government agencies that overstep regulatory boundaries set by Congress.
The important thing to understand, some people in the land use context do assert that they should have the right to the highest and best economic use of their property, but they do not, and they should not. Zoning has never permitted that…





