This issue of entitlement, we have discussed that and I understand the concern. But I want to point out in section 7 of my substitute amendment, there is language that makes clear beyond any doubt that we are not creating an entitlement in this bill. It is simply not so that we are creating an entitlement. You may disagree with the bill, but let me read again the clear language here: ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any obligation of the United States to make any payment under this act shall be subject to the availability of appropriations.'' We must appropriate the money.
Charles T. Canady: “This issue of entitlement, we have discussed that and I understand the concern. But I want to point out in section 7 of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing entitlement language in a substitute amendment during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
As we have discussed repeatedly throughout this debate, those of us who are in support of the underlying proposal find no fault with the first amendment to the United States Constitution. We believe that the framers of the first amendment…
the important thing to understand, some people in the land use context do assert that they should have the right to the highest and best economic use of their property, but they do not, and they should not. Zoning has never permitted that…
some time in the next few days, the last vote of the 106th Congress will be cast. For those of us who will not be returning next year, that vote will mark the end of our legislative career. Mr. Speaker, 260 years ago, Samuel Johnson wrote…
House Concurrent Resolution 247, a concurrent resolution to recognize the contributions of the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., was introduced by the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Watts). On April 4, 1968, the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther…





