I rise today to offer an avenue of relief to small businesses and individuals throughout the country who have done nothing wrong, but are nonetheless being held liable for the expensive task of Superfund site clean up. As you know, Congress passed the Superfund law in 1980 to clean up the country's most polluted waste sites. The merits of the Superfund effort are without question. Superfund sites are environmental disaster areas which have a clear potential for impact on public health and safety. Superfund sites must be cleaned up. But while the Superfund law may have a noble purpose, the details are a nightmare. The framers of Superfund, adhering to the concept of 'polluter pays,' created a scheme of joint and several and retroactive liability. This wrongheaded provision has forced many individuals and small businesses to pay a portion of the clean up costs although they are not in fact responsible for the pollution. This structure has resulted in a notorious tangle of litigation and enforcement, and it has wreaked havoc on the lives of innocent citizens while accomplishing very little in the way of actual clean up.
Charles T. Canady: “I rise today to offer an avenue of relief to small businesses and individuals throughout the country who have done…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the liabilities imposed on small businesses and individuals by the Superfund law.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
To those who say that this is an unconstitutional measure, I point out that the predicate for the operation of this bill is the existence of valid constitutional State laws, laws that have been adopted by State legislatures and which meet…
I am struck, as I listen to the debate here today, by the fact that the opponents of this bill really are here expressing opposition to the acts of State legislatures. They are here, in effect, expressing opposition to the decisions of the…
Mr. Speaker, S. 758 the Lobbying Disclosure Technical Amendments Act of 1997 addresses several technical issues which have been raised during the initial months of implementation of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. Once the Lobbying…
I rise to urge the Members of the House to reject this motion to recommit. Like most of the arguments that have been made against this bill, this motion to recommit has nothing to do with the substance or purpose of the bill. I just ask…





