I believe in all 50 State Constitutions reference to God is made. In our Declaration of Independence reference is made to the Creator. Throughout our life as a Nation references have been made to God in public documents and public events. So to attempt to cleanse the underlying amendment of the word ``God'' I think is simply moving in the wrong direction and is inconsistent with the fundamental purpose of this amendment. I would just suggest to the Members that they look at what this amendment would do and judge it in light of the history of our Nation and in light of the 50 State Constitutions. Turning to the second part of the amendment, which would remove the prohibition on the denial of benefits on account of religion, I would simply ask, why should anyone, any individual or any institution, be denied a benefit on account of religion? Why should we allow that to take place? Why should any person or any institution be subjected to a disadvantage because of that person or institution's religious nature or religious activity? It seems to me to allow such a policy of disadvantaging people and institutions simply because they are religious is the antithesis of our goal of protecting the free exercise of religion. Indeed, to deny a benefit on account of religion is to punish the free exercise of religion.
Charles T. Canady: “I believe in all 50 State Constitutions reference to God is made. In our Declaration of Independence reference is made…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of religious references in the context of an amendment.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
Mr. Chairman, the Private Property Rights Implementation Act of 2000, which is now under consideration by the House, would provide property owners with meaningful access to justice when they seek to assert their Federal rights under the…
I am not going to oppose the gentleman's amendment although I believe that there is a problem with the current system that needs to be rectified. Under the current system in many cases I believe that litigants who have a reasonable basis…
the important thing to understand, some people in the land use context do assert that they should have the right to the highest and best economic use of their property, but they do not, and they should not. Zoning has never permitted that…
Mr. Chairman, I think it is unfortunate that today in this debate we are hearing attacks on the motivation of those who are supporting this legislation. This legislation has been introduced because there is a real problem in the…





