I want to go to an actual example, the bald eagle, one of the few successes we can point to under the Endangered Species Act. The requirements in my part of the country were practical and simple. You had to leave one tree. You had to leave the nest tree. You could have 100 acres of land, but you had to leave one tree to recover the bald eagle. It has now recovered. That is a live and living symbol of the United States of America. I think it was worth saving the bald eagle. Under this legislation, we would have had to compensate every single person who saved one tree, one tree. Is that too much to ask? I do not believe that is an unwarranted intrusion. Ten percent is an absurd threshold. Ten percent of any portion of your land, that is 1 tree out of 10, you get compensated. That is not right. This is something that is taking the relief that is needed too far to hamstring and follow another agenda. This is the big developers' agenda. This is not going to help the little people of my district who have been having problems with the Federal Government.
Charles T. Canady: “I want to go to an actual example, the bald eagle, one of the few successes we can point to under the Endangered Species…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legislation related to land use and the Endangered Species Act.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
I am not going to oppose the gentleman's amendment although I believe that there is a problem with the current system that needs to be rectified. Under the current system in many cases I believe that litigants who have a reasonable basis…
some time in the next few days, the last vote of the 106th Congress will be cast. For those of us who will not be returning next year, that vote will mark the end of our legislative career. Mr. Speaker, 260 years ago, Samuel Johnson wrote…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4292, the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act is a simple but critical piece of legislation that is designed to ensure that, for purposes of Federal law, all infants who have been born alive are treated as persons who are…
It is true that the committee rejected an article of impeachment based on tax fraud against President Nixon, but it is equally clear that the overwhelming majority of the members of the committee who expressed an opinion on that subject…





