The point of order is the fundamental purpose of the underlying bill, H.R. 1122, deals with a very limited class of abortion, specifically partial-birth abortions. One specific type of procedure in the bill is what is dealt with in H.R. 1122. The fundamental purpose of the motion to recommit, in contrast to that, deals with any abortion procedure done post viability. It, therefore, purports to cover a much broader class of procedures. I believe that the impact of the motion to recommit would essentially be nil, because although it purports to affect a broader class of procedures, due to the exceptions contained in the motion to recommit, it is essentially meaningless.
Charles T. Canady: “The point of order is the fundamental purpose of the underlying bill, H.R. 1122, deals with a very limited class of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of H.R. 1122 and a motion to recommit related to abortion procedures.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
Given these pressures, farmers should not have to contend with government agencies that overstep regulatory boundaries set by Congress.
The MSPA Clarification Act, which I am introducing today, seeks to ease the inequitable burden on farmers.
Under the laws of all the States, those individuals that the gentlewoman has specified would be enabled to go with the young woman to a judge for the judicial bypass. That is available under all the laws as required by the Supreme Court.
The important thing to understand, some people in the land use context do assert that they should have the right to the highest and best economic use of their property, but they do not, and they should not. Zoning has never permitted that…





