I support and agree with what the gentleman is trying to do. But frankly, I am not satisfied that the language that he offers does not adversely affect other U.S. interests. That is the reason I rose in opposition to his amendment. It is just that I think there is too much confusion on that amendment as we speak, and the fact that we are considering an amendment that is different than the one the gentleman thought he offered I think just further worsens that situation.
C. W. Bill Young: “I support and agree with what the gentleman is trying to do. But frankly, I am not satisfied that the language that he…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about an amendment during a committee markup.
Share
More from C. W. Bill Young
I certainly agree to work with the gentleman on this matter to have a satisfactory conclusion.
I agree strongly with Mr. Murtha's statement about torture. I don't think Americans want to be known as a Nation that do torture. But we have put prohibitions on torture in our Defense appropriations bills almost from the beginning of the…
Well, let me reclaim my time and suggest that if you want to rewrite FISA, you don't do it on the floor on an appropriations bill. You introduce a bill, or you go to the proper committee of proper jurisdiction. This is not something you do…
In my enthusiasm for the manager's amendment, I transposed a number. I said the military mission line would protect 325 miles. It is actually 235 miles, which is still a good deal for Florida; but I just wanted to correct that I did…





