I said directly to the President, ``Mr. President, there are budgetary problems for fiscal year 2000 because of the 1997 budget agreement that put caps on our spending at $17 billion less than it was the year before.'' And I said, ``Mr. President, I think it is important for you personally to be engaged in this dialogue.'' So I considered that an invitation for the President to be involved in the conversations about the budget and about these appropriations bills. We have made the opening. We made the offer. We made the request of the President to get engaged. It was his decision not to do so.
C. W. Bill Young: “I said directly to the President, ``Mr. President, there are budgetary problems for fiscal year 2000 because of the 1997…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for presidential engagement in budgetary discussions.
Share
More from C. W. Bill Young
Actually, yes, and we appreciate that very much. But, anyway, let us pass the Putnam amendment. This is the right thing to do, and let us let the House work its will through the established process, through the committee process, a…
Reclaiming my time, believe me, I understand the gentlewoman's concerns. As I suggested, the Department of Defense understands that concern as well. But it was just a suggestion that maybe we could have the two of them work this out. But…
I will continue to yield in just a minute. On the legal aspects of this, I am going to Mr. Lungren. I think he is prepared, and he will probably get his own time, because I am limited to 2 minutes. But in the minute I have left, I will…
I make the point of order, reluctantly, I might say, against the amendment because it provides an appropriation for an unauthorized program and therefore violates clause 2 of rule XXI. Clause 2 of rule XXI states in pertinent part: ``An…





