I said directly to the President, ``Mr. President, there are budgetary problems for fiscal year 2000 because of the 1997 budget agreement that put caps on our spending at $17 billion less than it was the year before.'' And I said, ``Mr. President, I think it is important for you personally to be engaged in this dialogue.'' So I considered that an invitation for the President to be involved in the conversations about the budget and about these appropriations bills. We have made the opening. We made the offer. We made the request of the President to get engaged. It was his decision not to do so.
C. W. Bill Young: “I said directly to the President, ``Mr. President, there are budgetary problems for fiscal year 2000 because of the 1997…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for presidential engagement in budgetary discussions.
Share
More from C. W. Bill Young
Actually, yes, and we appreciate that very much. But, anyway, let us pass the Putnam amendment. This is the right thing to do, and let us let the House work its will through the established process, through the committee process, a…
I agree strongly with Mr. Murtha's statement about torture. I don't think Americans want to be known as a Nation that do torture. But we have put prohibitions on torture in our Defense appropriations bills almost from the beginning of the…
it is obvious that he has put a lot of time and effort into this amendment. The committee has reviewed the amendment thoroughly, and we will accept the amendment.
during the discussion on these appropriation bills, there have been a number of amendments to strike out issues that were added by the committee rather than requested by the administration. I think that is a good application of the…





