I rise first to support this conference report, but I also want to address another issue, especially to my fiscally conservative friends. They received in their offices today a publication that would appear to be coming from the Committee on Appropriations because it says Appropriations Update in the big headline. The actual author of the paper is shown in small print, which indicates that the author is the Committee on the Budget. It says that this bill exceeds by $30 million the 302(b) suballocation issued by the Committee on Appropriations. The problem is, at least I guess what it is, the Committee on the Budget has one budget resolution to pass in the House, then that resolution goes to Senate, and then the House and Senate go to conference on that one resolution. Then they bring a conference agreement back, and we barely pass the budget resolution. The Committee on Appropriations has 13 regular fiscal year bills and, this year, three supplementals. So when we start to go to conference with the other body on all these bills, we have got to have the ability to negotiate the 302(b) allocations with the other body so we end up with the same 302(b)s in the House and in the Senate for each bill. In fact, if Members are concerned about this publication that was distributed today, let me say there should be no confusion. The Interior conference report is within the 302(b) allocation that was agreed to by myself and Senator Stevens.
C. W. Bill Young: “I rise first to support this conference report, but I also want to address another issue, especially to my fiscally…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget allocations and a publication related to appropriations.
Share
More from C. W. Bill Young
it is obvious that he has put a lot of time and effort into this amendment. The committee has reviewed the amendment thoroughly, and we will accept the amendment.
during the discussion on these appropriation bills, there have been a number of amendments to strike out issues that were added by the committee rather than requested by the administration. I think that is a good application of the…
Actually, yes, and we appreciate that very much. But, anyway, let us pass the Putnam amendment. This is the right thing to do, and let us let the House work its will through the established process, through the committee process, a…
this debate is not about politics. This debate is about America. It is about Iraq because Iraq is one of the many battlefields on which we fight the global war on terror. Afghanistan is another battlefield on which we fight the war on…





