This legislation does stir a great number of emotions in me. I do know what it is to protect life, take life, and to see life lost, and our role should always be to protect the innocent. But I also know that our role as a society has been to subsidize the genocide of our unborn, and that reflects how desensitized we have become to the true value of a child each year, as we kill hundreds of thousands of the most innocent among us: unborn children who smile, who grab, and who are self-aware and feel pain. If we truly are what we do, then who are we if we purposely bring unthinkable pain to a baby boy or baby girl just before their life is snuffed out of them? This legislation is a leap forward for our collective conscience as a nation, and it is a strong step forward in returning value to life that we see, especially the most unique life that exists out there: that special creature that was created by God.
Brian Mast: “This legislation does stir a great number of emotions in me. I do know what it is to protect life, take life, and to see…”
Share
More from Brian Mast
Mr. Speaker, I think I figured something out. If my colleagues keep saying that 4 days is forever, then maybe that is why they can't talk about what imminent threat means. They can't figure out the definition of these things. Imminent…
Would you like to say 5,000 deaths in New York is an emergency? Crickets. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Meeks) for the purpose of a colloquy. Would you like to respond: 5,000 deaths in New York is an emergency.
This started with political people starting gangs there for their own benefit. And most of the politicians there are beyond guilty of pillaging their own country instead of doing something good for their country.
I would let my colleague know that just one-- because he said Canada plays almost no role in fentanyl deaths--one 70-pound bust of fentanyl alone was enough to kill every single person in New York City. Again, my colleague is unwilling to…





