I hoped that my colleague who was just speaking would stay for more debate, but I would be curious. The gentlewoman intends to vote to tell the President that all U.S. Forces must be removed from hostilities. Do they feel as though that is a sound strategy to reach the conclusion that they want in the midst of a cease-fire? It sounds like they haven't calculated that. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Questioning a colleague's strategy regarding U.S. military involvement during a cease-fire.
Share
More from Brian Mast
Let me answer some of the questions that my colleagues put up. Why did President Trump take Maduro? It was to protect the homeland of the United States of America, as he has done with action after action after action. It is the same reason…
There are not U.S. combat forces conducting operations or engaged in hostilities in Lebanon.
AI has the ability to create superpowers, whether it creates a supervillain or whether it creates a superhero, that depends on the actions that are taken
This is serious. It is more serious than when my colleagues can't even acknowledge a hint of an emergency, a hint of imminence related to the threat of Iran--there is nothing to see there--even though last Congress so many of them voted…
Other voices in this conversation
