the report language that accompanies the fiscal year 2002 Transportation Appropriations bill identifies many worthy projects that the committee recommends be funded by the Department of Transportation. I thank the chairwoman for her and the committee's support of projects in Florida that were requested by Senator Graham and myself. However, many other worthwhile projects were not included on this list. It is my understanding that the report language is intended to guide conferees in setting the final spending measure, but does not preclude other projects from also being considered for inclusion. Is this correct?
Bill Nelson: “the report language that accompanies the fiscal year 2002 Transportation Appropriations bill identifies many worthy…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the fiscal year 2002 Transportation Appropriations bill and project funding.
Share
More from Bill Nelson
I assure you NASA is and will be if, I am around, not only bipartisan, but nonpartisan, and it will continue that way.
Not only work with you, we want it to work, because the Habitable Worlds, which is one that we go in the 2040s, we have got to start it now.
That's like eating our seed corn. We're not going to have anything to plant next year in the quest of trying to understand what is part of the statutes for NASA, which is to search for life, and therefore to understand who we are, what we…
One of the reasons you and I were able to accomplish so much on this committee is both of us worked very hard to keep politics out of NASA and to focus on the core mission of exploration.





