On the recordApril 21, 2010
To abandon Ares I as a baseline vehicle for an alternative, without demonstrated capability nor proven superiority, or even equivalence, is unwise and probably not cost-effective.
Source
congress.govTo abandon Ares I as a baseline vehicle for an alternative, without demonstrated capability nor proven superiority, or even equivalence, is unwise and probably not cost-effective.
Bill Nelson cites an Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel statement against abandoning Ares I.
Share
More from Bill Nelson
Not only work with you, we want it to work, because the Habitable Worlds, which is one that we go in the 2040s, we have got to start it now.
As a matter of fact, we have already spent $200 million to date to address this groundwater contamination problem, and we are committed to continuing the investigation and evaluation, along with our partner, the New Mexico Environment…
Continued Congressional support is critical to the success of the CLD program.