It seems to me that it makes common sense that since the Federal Government is getting into the business of terrorism insurance in such a big-time way, that we ought to separate out the premiums in a separate account, purely from an accounting function, so there is no question that those terrorism premiums get commingled with all the other premiums and suddenly we do not know how much that is. I further ask the distinguished Senator, does the Senator's bill require that premiums collected for terrorism risk be used for terrorism losses only?
Bill Nelson: “It seems to me that it makes common sense that since the Federal Government is getting into the business of terrorism…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for separate accounting of terrorism insurance premiums during a debate on related legislation.
Share
More from Bill Nelson
NASA clearly has a vested interest in attracting, engaging, and preparing its future STEM professionals.
We are on the same page, and NASA owns and operates that local public water system, so we have every reason to continue this investigation.
It will fly supersonic but its design is such a radical design, that instead of pushing the bow wave going through the atmosphere, as you go from subsonic to supersonic, which causes that audible sound that goes 'boom, boom,' it will…
That's like eating our seed corn. We're not going to have anything to plant next year in the quest of trying to understand what is part of the statutes for NASA, which is to search for life, and therefore to understand who we are, what we…





