On the recordMay 21, 2013
I believe that this amendment would represent a violation of the ex post facto provision in the Constitution.
Source
congress.govI believe that this amendment would represent a violation of the ex post facto provision in the Constitution.
Grayson argues the amendment violates constitutional protections against retroactive laws.
Share & report
More from Alan Grayson
I hesitate to think that any of my colleagues would come out and say they're pro-pollution, but that's essentially what it means when you say that you're against clean power.
there's traditional corn that I think will be around for a while due to the political nature of this country.
I hope that today's hearing will provide the insights needed to accomplish that goal.