This very same bill limits this subsidy to $500 per passenger. Earlier on in this bill, that is a determination that this bill requires to be made. I am simply changing that figure from $500 to $250. It is, shall I say, unwarranted. To say that that is expecting any new law, enacting anything new, it is simply modifying another provision in this specific act. The Acting CHAIR. The Chair finds that this amendment includes language requiring a new determination. The amendment, therefore, constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of rule XXI. The point of order is sustained, and the amendment is not in order.
Alan Grayson: “This very same bill limits this subsidy to $500 per passenger. Earlier on in this bill, that is a determination that…”
Share
More from Alan Grayson
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 0, nays 362, answered ``present'' 1, not voting 70, as follows: [Roll No. 405] NAYS--362 Abraham Adams…
But here's my point. You're not just doing this for the sake of advancing scientific knowledge; you're doing this so that we can actually sequester carbon on a large scale and reduce pollution, correct?
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds made…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Florida will be postponed. Amendment No. 13 Offered by Mr. Kildee The Acting CHAIR. It is…





