shouldn't we be looking at the requirements for the operating life of these batteries and extending that?

If we had to do this all over again, we should be smart enough to do actually what they have done in France.

We should be able to find or provide an incentive system so that States would willingly, unlike Nevada, would willing say, please, put your nuclear spent fuel here in our State.

I can do everything in my power to work with the Administration, to work with my colleagues, Democrat and Republicans, to protect the Clean Air Act.

The health benefits from reducing these pollutants in EPA's cost benefit analysis of the air toxic regulation?

God knows some of us tried. But we have not done our job.

It is not fair. I would just State to my friends that don't have to face this problem, there is a moral imperative here.

it is a joy to watch you do your job before this panel. Never lose your cool, always good with your answers.

we are in a battle, an economic battle with the rest of the world. Competition is a lot tougher than it was when some of us were born.

I think there is a moral imperative at work here.

We concluded a long time ago that Federal standards are the best way to ensure consistent air pollution reductions occur around our Country.