My first amendment deals with the enemy combatant doctrine, and what the bill does is that it provides that none of the funds in this act can be used to detain for more than 30 days anyone apprehended on U.S. territory solely because that person is identified as an enemy combatant. That is to say, detention of over 30 days of anyone apprehended in the United States would be done under our regular criminal law. Now, first let us talk about what this amendment is not. This amendment does not try to protect our privacy. There will be incursions into our privacy in this war on terror, but it is one thing to say the government may know something about what we are doing or reading. It is another thing to say that the executive branch alone can incarcerate any of us permanently, and that is the wrong that this amendment addresses. Second, this amendment is not about those apprehended on foreign battlefields or on any foreign territory. It addresses only those apprehended on U.S. territory. Third, this amendment does not authorize any Federal agency to do anything. It is a limitation amendment, and so by its terms, it prevents the use of funds to detain someone for over 30 days.
Wendy Sherman: “My first amendment deals with the enemy combatant doctrine, and what the bill does is that it provides that none of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the detention of enemy combatants on U.S. territory.
Share
More from Wendy Sherman
it is customary, when we consider major legislation, to give credit to those who created the bill. The ghost of Sam Bankman-Fried looms above this auditorium. He is the genius behind this GENIUS Act, and one can only hope that he is able…
I will deal with a third issue, an issue I first addressed on this floor in the year 2020. At that time, more than a few of my friends said: Sherman, don't talk about this. You sound like a lunatic, because I put forward the idea that…
I don’t think it is possible to get a deal with Iran where they literally dismantle their program, give up their enrichment, even though that would be ideal.
last month Secretary Rubio responded to me and said no one had died as a result of the gutting of USAID, but Boston University School of Public Health shows us that 300,000 people have died already because they were cut off from food and…





