I would just build on the remarks of the ranking member, which the chairman chose to associate himself with, and say if those are speeches against my amendment, I welcome them. I hope those that are listening will not just note on which side the gentleman rose, but what they actually said. The content of what they said, I think, supports my amendment far more eloquently than I can. I yield back the balance of my time. The CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Sherman). The amendment was agreed to.
Wendy Sherman: “I would just build on the remarks of the ranking member, which the chairman chose to associate himself with, and say if…”
Share
More from Wendy Sherman
you might think it is hypocritical that they tell us that we have to have crypto because, otherwise, China will do it. Then they say: We can't have a digital dollar because China is doing it. That is not inconsistent. They are consistent…
This bill is an attack on working families, which is why the AFL-CIO says no, and they are scoring it. This bill prohibits Congress Members from sponsoring cryptocurrencies because of the obvious corruption and conflict of interest, but it…
for 30 years, I have served on the Foreign Affairs Committee, where I currently serve as the chief Democrat on the Middle East and North Africa Subcommittee. I have spent 30 years fighting to make sure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon…
I don’t think it is possible to get a deal with Iran where they literally dismantle their program, give up their enrichment, even though that would be ideal.





