It criminalizes not just actively being part of the conspiracy but someone who assists in the insurrection, and here Donald Trump obviously assisted.
Neal Katyal: “It criminalizes not just actively being part of the conspiracy but someone who assists in the insurrection, and here…”
Editor's note · Context
Katyal explains the legal implications of Trump's actions in relation to the insurrection.
Share
More from Neal Katyal
This special master has become a nightmare for Trump and the icing on the cake is that Trump did it to himself.
No other president in our lifetimes has ever attempted to violate for-cause removal statutes in this manner.
I think it’s very hard for Merrick Garland at this point, not to indict Donald Trump in federal court. He is, you know, looks like the evidence shows. He’s committed really serious, incredibly serious crimes, and the rulebook kind of…
I think that this really almost forces Merrick Garland, given what the Court of Appeal said last week, to do -- to indict Donald Trump there say -- the Court of Appeals saying, this is really serious, there's no abuse of rights.





