I think undermining his secretary of state, undercutting him particularly with respect to North Korea. And creating a binary choice where it's either fire and fury or destroying North Korea or nothing.
James Clapper: “I think undermining his secretary of state, undercutting him particularly with respect to North Korea. And creating a…”
Editor's note · Context
Clapper discusses the implications of President Trump's approach to foreign policy and the potential consequences of creating binary choices in international relations.
Share
More from James Clapper
No, I don't. The Chinese setup is that there is a Polit bureau member who is the overseer -- the senior overseer on behalf of the Polit bureau for the entirety of the Intelligence and Security apparatus of China.
I think right now, they're assessing the administration -- that's the National Security Council specifically, is assessing the impacts of this first round of strikes.
Well, Anderson, that's exactly right. And this is what this whole issue boils down to, is will to fight.
Well, no, it doesn't. And the fact that none of this makes sense, but most acutely, I think, nuclear-related information.





