I think undermining his secretary of state, undercutting him particularly with respect to North Korea. And creating a binary choice where it's either fire and fury or destroying North Korea or nothing.
James Clapper: “I think undermining his secretary of state, undercutting him particularly with respect to North Korea. And creating a…”
Editor's note · Context
Clapper discusses the implications of President Trump's approach to foreign policy and the potential consequences of creating binary choices in international relations.
Share
More from James Clapper
I think he's trying to erase any vestiges of as much as he can of culpability that people that were caught up in this investigation.
given the broad distribution, low cost, and accelerated pace of development of this dual-use technology, its deliberate or unintentional misuse might lead to far-reaching economic and national security implications.
There's this gray area of First Amendment protection rights versus an insidious presence in our country that is really there to weaken and destroy our system. That's really what this is about. And its state sponsored.
this is the standard Russian -- Soviet Russian way of war. Surround a city if they can and they are having trouble doing that, put it under siege, strangle it, prevent supplies, medicines, food, water, et cetera and then bombard the city…





