This is a court that is -- at least with regard to five of its members, are pretty radical, and not at all feeling that they have to be bound by the notion of precedence.
Eric Holder: “This is a court that is -- at least with regard to five of its members, are pretty radical, and not at all feeling that…”
Editor's note · Context
Holder characterizes the current Supreme Court as radical and lacking respect for legal precedents.
Share
More from Eric Holder
In this moment, steps must be taken to respond to the authoritarian measures being considered in certain states and now so brazenly taken in Texas.
If stock trades are made close in time to something a negative happening to the bank that immediately raises suspicions.
What worries me about this moment now is that this administration, aided by this Supreme Court, is bound and determined to take us back to a time that I thought, that we all thought, that might have been behind us,’’
This is a slam dunk. I mean, this is not -- this should not be a difficult case to resolve. This is a classic Section 2 violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the crown jewel of the civil rights movement.





