All I can say is that with regard to the South Carolina law, we looked at the evidence that was provided to us by South Carolina; did not feel that the evidence about voter fraud was substantial enough to overcome the disproportionate impact that the changes in their voting procedures had on minorities, older people, young people.
Eric Holder explains the DOJ's decision against South Carolina's voter ID law due to its discriminatory impact.
Share
More from Eric Holder
I think people at the Justice Department are certainly going to be examined. Certainly people who were involved in the matter actually there on January 6 and people who directed them.
It's a pretty breathtaking thing what Republicans are trying to do in North Carolina.
We cannot allow what happened on January 6 to go unpunished, because then it would invite something like that to happen again in the future.
Other voices in this conversation
