I ask my colleagues to give a very serious look at the CBC budget this year, a year when we can afford this budget. Mr. Chairman, in the 1980's we saw a massive transfer of funds from the domestic side of the budget to the military side of the budget. If we look for a theme in the CBC budget this year, it is giving something back from that side of the budget where we have been largely successful to the domestic side of the budget, once again. Mr. Chairman, we are paying for the transfer and we are paying dearly. As we look at the crime in our streets, Mr. Chairman, we know that the causes are multiple, but is there a person in this body who would not concede that the cities did not profit from the transfer from one side of the budget to the other? Look at what our budget would do in education, training, and social services. We are asking for nearly $2 billion more than the $19 billion that is already in the budget. The money would go for job training, for Pell grants, for job creation in the health care industry, for example. Something has begun to happen to me in the streets of the District of Columbia. Over and over again, young black men, in particular, come up to me say what I have not heard them say directly to my face before, 'Congresswoman, I need a job,' over and over again.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the CBC budget and its impact on domestic funding during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Eleanor Holmes Norton
H.R. 8505 would provide FMCSA with better tools to root out unscrupulous actors, which are also harmful to consumers and highway safety.
Mr. Speaker, today, I introduce the Federal Employee Short-Term Disability Insurance Act of 2026, which would make short-term disability insurance available to federal employees.
I thank my friend for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I strongly oppose this rule and the full-year continuing resolution. The CR is an act of fiscal sabotage against D.C. and is an abuse of power over a disenfranchised jurisdiction, the…
However, in 2020, soon after Mr. DeJoy became Postal General, the Postal Service declared that 'postal police officers should no longer be assigned to investigate or prevent mail theft or protection of letter carriers,' end quote, except…





