Political Quotes

Eleanor Holmes Norton: I thank the gentleman for yielding, but I need to thank him for much more, for not only sponsoring this bill, but for…

On the recordDecember 1, 2010
I thank the gentleman for yielding, but I need to thank him for much more, for not only sponsoring this bill, but for shepherding this bill. It was not always smooth sailing, but it was mostly smooth sailing because its underlying purpose is so clear and necessary. I appreciate that it has been a bipartisan bill both here and in the Senate. I certainly appreciate its bipartisan sponsorship by Representative Biggert and you, Mr. Carnahan. I know that this bill will be gratifying to Mr. Oberstar, who has presided over much of the building of the Federal inventory during his extraordinary service here in the House. May I thank my good friend, the ranking member, Mr. Diaz-Balart, with whom I've worked so closely and so well since I became chair, for his work not only on this bill but on the many bills and the many hearings we have held together. Madam Speaker, what we have to consider is that the Federal building inventory amounts to $43 billion of investment of the taxpayers of the United States over many decades. It is clearly irreplaceable.
Said by
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Democratic · District of Columbia
Source
govinfo.gov
Dec 1, 2010

Editor's note · Context

The speaker is discussing the importance and bipartisan support of a bill related to the Federal building inventory.

Share

More from Eleanor Holmes Norton

Jul 23, 2024

I would like to thank subcommittee Chair Rick Crawford for holding this hearing on transportation regulations.

congress.gov
Aug 5, 2024

Sincerely, Alliance for American Manufacturing.

congress.gov
Sep 10, 2024

I strongly opposed the Supreme Court's decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency. I urge this committee to take up legislation to overturn the Sackett decision and restore Clean Water Act protections for the Nation's rivers…

congress.gov
Jul 21, 2025

In my long career representing D.C. residents in Congress, I have rarely seen a bill as unreasonable and patronizing to the more than 700,000 people who live in the nation’s capital as this one.

newrepublic.com

Other voices in this conversation