Even if a law does clearly and undeniably discriminate on the basis of transgender status, then it still wouldn’t trigger heightened scrutiny.
Amy Coney Barrett: “Even if a law does clearly and undeniably discriminate on the basis of transgender status, then it still wouldn’t…”
Editor's note · Context
Barrett argues that discrimination against transgender people is not inherently suspect under the law.
Share
More from Amy Coney Barrett
We have always required employees to sign a confidentially agreement but recently we begin requiring employees to sign a nondisclosure agreement, which we do have carveouts for whistleblowers and that sort of thing.
And I didn't know how to respond because maybe I lack imagination, but I didn't expect that performing this service was going to put me in the position of explaining to my children what a bulletproof vest was and why I had to wear one.
Petitioner turned to a private attorney who was willing to spread knowingly false claims of election fraud to spearhead his challenges to the election results.
I think people who criticize the court or who are outside say a lot of different things. But again, the point that I make in the book is that we have to tune those things out.





