Even if a law does clearly and undeniably discriminate on the basis of transgender status, then it still wouldn’t trigger heightened scrutiny.
Amy Coney Barrett: “Even if a law does clearly and undeniably discriminate on the basis of transgender status, then it still wouldn’t…”
Editor's note · Context
Barrett argues that discrimination against transgender people is not inherently suspect under the law.
Share
More from Amy Coney Barrett
The election-day statutes require the electorate's choice to be made on election day. That occurs so long as election day is the deadline for individuals to vote—as it is in Mississippi," Barrett wrote.
We are doing our best. we have instituted protocols to keep better track of who has access to document, who has touched documents when printed. We have always required employees to sign a confidentially agreement but recently we begin…
They have required my children to think about and see things that children should not have to see or think about.
I think precisely because of those sorts of things, yes, it is my understanding that the lower federal courts are also in great need of security funding and have been pushing for that in their courthouses and through GSA as well.





