If laws that classify based on transgender status necessarily trigger heightened scrutiny, then the courts will inevitably be in the business of ‘closely scrutiniz(ing) legislative choices’ in all these domains.
Amy Coney Barrett: “If laws that classify based on transgender status necessarily trigger heightened scrutiny, then the courts will…”
Editor's note · Context
Barrett discusses the implications of legal scrutiny on laws affecting transgender individuals.
Share
More from Amy Coney Barrett
And I didn't know how to respond because maybe I lack imagination, but I didn't expect that performing this service was going to put me in the position of explaining to my children what a bulletproof vest was and why I had to wear one.
I think precisely because of those sorts of things, yes, it is my understanding that the lower federal courts are also in great need of security funding and have been pushing for that in their courthouses and through GSA as well.
Is it your contention that every country needed to be tariffed because of threats to the defense and industrial base?
The election-day statutes require the electorate's choice to be made on election day. That occurs so long as election day is the deadline for individuals to vote—as it is in Mississippi," Barrett wrote.





