It is easy to get caught up in the process of what we do here, but the substance is also terribly important. I would say, for both procedural reasons and substantive reasons, we should reject the proposition of my colleague that is before us today. The substantive reasons are more important than any other, because, after all, we work in this process and process is important, but substance is what brings us to Congress. It is substance that we fight for in the policies, and the substance here is very clear. As we have been able to expand family planning, we have not only improved the economic situation of the poorest of the poor in this world, we have not only been able to reduce death and injury to the mothers of the children of this world, but we have also reduced abortion, reduced abortion across the globe where U.S. family planning funds were able to exercise freely and compete in the globe.
Sam Gejdenson: “It is easy to get caught up in the process of what we do here, but the substance is also terribly important. I would…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of substance over process in relation to family planning funding.
Share
More from Sam Gejdenson
America's workers have made the record 107 month economic expansion possible. They deserve to reap the rewards of our national prosperity.
The bill before us today, H.R. 3932, takes some steps in the right direction on pensions.
Mr. Speaker, I join with my chairman, the gentleman from New York (Mr. Gilman), in support of this resolution. It was interesting that in less than half an hour on this floor we had over one-quarter of the Members join us as cosponsors of…
in the entire time the United States has spent involved in conflicts around the world, there has never been an instance where our European allies have played as significant a role. Our role here is among the smallest of any engagement that…





