Political Quotes

Nancy L. Johnson: our senior citizens have worked their entire lives to protect the savings that can assure them a safe and secure…

On the recordFebruary 12, 1997
our senior citizens have worked their entire lives to protect the savings that can assure them a safe and secure retirement. Social Security is one of the two pillars of retirement security for our seniors. We owe it to them to protect the benefits that they planned for and depend upon. That is why I have introduced legislation to repeal the tax increase on Social Security that was adopted in 1993. Our seniors helped make America the greatest country in the world. The Federal Government should not jeopardize their quality of life by punishing them with high taxes on their Social Security benefits. Repealing this increase is a matter of fairness and will help senior citizens, especially those with moderate incomes keep more of their own money in their own pockets. I urge my colleagues to join me as cosponsors of this critical legislation for our senior constituents.
Said by
Nancy L. Johnson
Connecticut

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the need to repeal the tax increase on Social Security benefits for seniors.

Share

More from Nancy L. Johnson

Oct 6, 2005

I was an early and fervent supporter of providing health benefits to families on welfare as they made the difficult transition to work, often to entry-level jobs not providing basic care for their children. So I appreciate the need for…

govinfo.gov
Jun 1, 2004

For instance, someone said, why do not we have a prescription drug benefit that is part of traditional Medicare? That is what we should have passed. Folks, that is what we did pass. The bill we passed made prescription drugs a benefit…

govinfo.gov
Jun 1, 2004

I have served in Congress a long time; and when there is a real problem in the lives of the people you represent, I believe your job is to solve it. I believe your job is to take action, to do something; and I know that this is the most…

govinfo.gov
Jun 23, 2005

does the gentleman feel confident even without any placeholder, should, say, the Senate fail to provide a placeholder, as they have in the past, that we will be able to address this in conference?

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation