No, three things do. There are lots of things about holding costs down. First of all, the cost driver is the increased ability to diagnose and treat illness. We know a lot more about diagnosing. We can do a lot more tests and treatment. I want a solution that guarantees you will still get the diagnosis and treatment you want. I don't want arbitrary global budgets that will deny you treatments or care when you need it. I want to change the system so it makes better decisions, doesn't duplicate tests, doesn't provide inappropriate care, doesn't give you stuff you don't need just to make a profit, and that is what the Republican system does.
Nancy L. Johnson: “No, three things do. There are lots of things about holding costs down. First of all, the cost driver is the increased…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing healthcare costs and the need for effective diagnosis and treatment.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
I do not consider the AARP a special interest group, or the Coalition to Ensure Patient Access a special interest group, or the Alzheimer's Association a special interest group, or the Kidney Cancer Association a special interest group.
But we need to do something better than the Senate position, and we certainly need to avoid the additional 2 percent cut that starts every year thereafter.
I absolutely do. I think we are facing the possibility of physicians fleeing the Medicare program and creating a real access problem for seniors to physicians of their choice. But acceding to the Senate position is not going to fix it; it…
Yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Hulshof). (Mr. HULSHOF asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)





